Stumble This | You should also watch “A New Standard for Deception by NIST” |
bullshit,horseshit,nonscience,programming,disinformation,lies Response to Recent NIST Reports WTC 7 Collapse
Comments 
playlists with this video
9/11 Analysis by Constitutional_Patriot
• World Trade Center by choggie
who voted for this video
choggie
- shuac
- EDD
- Openmine
- kulpims
- Constitutional_Patriot
who voted against this video
dbalsdon
- Doc_M
who has this post bookmarked
Constitutional_Patriot
Response To Recent NIST Reports WTC 7 Collapse Related Videos
 9/11 WTC 7 Collapse: Is it a controlled demolition? | A New Standard for Deception by NIST |  9/11 Mysteries-Fine Art of Structural Demolitions |
Featured Member Comment
Dog barks, invents projectile water farts in the process - “I have now seen everything on the internet. There is nothing more to see. How do you top barking doggie water projectile farts?” read more by Efflixi
Friends O' the Sift
Top New Videos by Vote
Subscribe
Top 15 Sifters of All Time
Top 15 Sifters of the Past Week
VideoSift Links
I also love the appeals to everything being "obvious" and the condescending attitude the speakers take. Who needs science and fact when things are obvious? Like, for instance, obviously we are the center of the universe because when we look at the sky it is obvious the sun and stars revolve around us. And it's so obvious the world is flat--you can see the edge of it every time you look at the horizon! And of course those towers falling... quite obviously the work of some government conspiracy.
And he couldn't possibly have meant, when he said "pull it," that they should pull out all firemen and equipment trying to save the building. Noooo, that wouldn't be possible at all.
Uhm, noone was hurt when building 7 came down?
Morons.
And we are forgetting, or are we not, doubters and idiots, that buildings only fall like WTC 7 did, when s'ploded....??
Critical thinking being a commodity lost to imbeciles taught to "learn" in bereft institutions and public schools, is there a possibility that an "official" report contains loads of horseshit, and that the word "official" is only a word, meaningless unless AFFORDED SUITABLE CONTEXT???? The NIST report is shit until proven not shit, and it can't be proven such....because even they most likely, don't have all the proper information, and if they do, they are selective and biased in their conclusions......Morons my ass....a moron pooh poohs a possibility because denial is much more palatable.....
The fucking thing did not fall from a fire, and some sprinkies not working, folks.....if ya believe that, then well, join the other morons, on the slow-moving barge to Denseville......
Steel is strong, Iron...is not.
Bam...down she comes.
Doesnt happen elsewhere cause noone uses sulphur based products in their office equipment, not since the freakin 80's.
But what would I know ehh chog ?
*promote
pull
transitive verb
6: to remove from a place or situation
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pull
Why would he be ordering a demolishing on the day in question? Those things take weeks to set up, it's not something you do on a whim.
Or if he was talking about rescue operations...
pull
transitive verb
6: to remove from a place or situation
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pull
Why would he be ordering a demolishing on the day in question? Those things take weeks to set up, it's not something you do on a whim.
pull "it"
"It" usually doesn't refer to people
Re: Why would he be ordering a demolishing on the day in question? Those things take weeks to set up, it's not something you do on a whim.
Exactly.. which is why this is a major problem. If detonators were placed before the day in question then this would be a smoking gun that this was an inside job.
Thousands of people working in the building wouldn't notice this? Tens of thousands wouldn't have noticed hundreds of men drilling holes in WTC 1&2 ? The amount of holes and wiring would be staggering. Also, if you've ever seen a demolition video you would know how loud they are. People saying "oh i heard a bomb" on video on the day in question can hardly be reliant witnesses, there was a lot of confusion and bomb sounds can very easily be gas tanks, something collapsing e.t.c. Also, to take down those big buildings you would need hundreds of bombs, making hundreds of bomb sounds. It's very clear in the videos that nothing of that sort is heard.
Also, "it" can refer to an "operation" .. salvage or rescue. I don't think he would talk so nonchalantly about it if he really ordered them to be "pulled".
My bet would be on that they knew the attack was coming, but didn't stop it. Controlled explosives or airplanes with lazer pods under them just doesn't cut it for me.
----
I even found a video supporting my case: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43F54hR0NW8
*discard